Pursuant to Decision No. 2026/1 issued by the Ministry of Treasury and Finance and the Ministry of Interior, the assets of individuals and organizations linked to the FETÖ/PDY and DHKP/C terrorist groups located in Turkey have been frozen, in accordance with the Law No. 6415 on the Prevention of Financing of Terrorism. The decision entered into force upon its publication, and affected parties may file an objection with the Ankara Assize Court or request the lifting of the asset freezing measure.
The Constitutional Court reviewed the constitutionality of Article 56 of Law No. 5510, which mandates the termination of death benefits and the recovery of payments made to individuals who continue to cohabit with their divorced spouses. The Court held that the regulation serves the legitimate aims of protecting the social security system, preventing the misuse of benefits, and ensuring the efficient use of public funds. Concluding that the limitation on property rights is proportional and serves the public interest, the Court dismissed the annulment request.
The Constitutional Court of Turkey reviewed the constitutionality of Article 287 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law, which mandates courts to immediately grant a provisional grace period for concordat applications upon fulfillment of procedural requirements. The Court rejected the request for annulment, ruling that the provision does not violate the right to property or the right to a fair trial, noting that the measure constitutes a temporary, objective protection mechanism that balances the interests of debtors and creditors within the state's positive obligations.
The Constitutional Court of Turkey reviewed the constitutionality of Article 139 of the Turkish Penal Code, which regulates the prosecution of unauthorized disclosure or seizure of personal data without the requirement of a formal complaint. The Court ruled that establishing such offenses as ex-officio prosecutable is within the legislature's discretion to protect public interest, public order, and the integrity of personal data. Consequently, the Court dismissed the claim that the provision violates the principles of the rule of law and equality, finding the regulation constitutional.
The applicant company claimed that the transfer of its easement rights and facilities to the Treasury under Decree-Law No. 667, based on alleged links to a terrorist organization, violated its right to property. The Constitutional Court ruled that the right to property was violated, ordering a retrial to eliminate the consequences of the violation and referring the matter to the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM) for legislative review.
Presidential Decree No. 2026/176 cancels and establishes certain staff positions and personnel quotas within various State Economic Enterprises, including tea, railway, soil products, and energy sectors.
Due to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's visit to Qatar, Vice President Cevdet Yılmaz will serve as Acting President on July 14, 2026, in accordance with Article 106 of the Constitution of the Republic of Turkey.
The regulation governing the establishment and operation of the Design Application and Research Center at Gazi University, dated 2015, has been repealed.
The Gulf Studies and Global Policies Application and Research Center has been established within Ibn Haldun University. The regulation defines the center's objectives as establishing an academic bridge between Turkey and Gulf countries, producing scientific data on the region, and conducting strategic analyses. The center will be managed by a Director, an Administrative Board, and an Advisory Board, and its activities will include organizing academic research, conferences, publications, and educational programs on the region.
Pursuant to Decision No. 2026/1 issued by the Ministry of Treasury and Finance and the Ministry of Interior, the assets of individuals and organizations linked to the FETÖ/PDY and DHKP/C terrorist groups located in Turkey have been frozen, in accordance with the Law No. 6415 on the Prevention of Financing of Terrorism. The decision entered into force upon its publication, and affected parties may file an objection with the Ankara Assize Court or request the lifting of the asset freezing measure.
The Ministry of Treasury and Finance has lifted the asset freeze order previously imposed on Omar Alwaki under the Law on the Prevention of Financing of Terrorism, stating that the grounds for the measure no longer exist.
The applicant company claimed that the transfer of its easement rights and facilities to the Treasury under Decree-Law No. 667, based on alleged links to a terrorist organization, violated its right to property. The Constitutional Court ruled that the right to property was violated, ordering a retrial to eliminate the consequences of the violation and referring the matter to the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM) for legislative review.
⚠ Document too long (34 pages); summary generated from first and last pages.
Read in the Official Gazette →The Constitutional Court reviewed the constitutionality of Article 56 of Law No. 5510, which mandates the termination of death benefits and the recovery of payments made to individuals who continue to cohabit with their divorced spouses. The Court held that the regulation serves the legitimate aims of protecting the social security system, preventing the misuse of benefits, and ensuring the efficient use of public funds. Concluding that the limitation on property rights is proportional and serves the public interest, the Court dismissed the annulment request.
The Constitutional Court of Turkey reviewed the constitutionality of Article 287 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law, which mandates courts to immediately grant a provisional grace period for concordat applications upon fulfillment of procedural requirements. The Court rejected the request for annulment, ruling that the provision does not violate the right to property or the right to a fair trial, noting that the measure constitutes a temporary, objective protection mechanism that balances the interests of debtors and creditors within the state's positive obligations.
The Constitutional Court of Turkey reviewed the constitutionality of Article 139 of the Turkish Penal Code, which regulates the prosecution of unauthorized disclosure or seizure of personal data without the requirement of a formal complaint. The Court ruled that establishing such offenses as ex-officio prosecutable is within the legislature's discretion to protect public interest, public order, and the integrity of personal data. Consequently, the Court dismissed the claim that the provision violates the principles of the rule of law and equality, finding the regulation constitutional.