23.06.2026 Official Gazette Summary — Issue 33289

Amendments to the Insurance Information and Monitoring Center Regulation

The amendment to the Insurance Information and Monitoring Center Regulation updates institutional references from the 'Undersecretariat' to the 'Insurance and Private Pension Regulation and Supervision Agency (SEDDK)', transitions data reporting to a real-time basis, and introduces an 'excess usage fee' for system access. Furthermore, it authorizes the establishment of accident fault assessment commissions and enables the Center to open branches.

Constitutional Court Ruling on FETÖ-Linked Public Official Dismissal Case

In the individual application filed by Doğan Doğan, it was alleged that his dismissal from public service due to alleged links with FETÖ/PDY violated his right to respect for private life and the presumption of innocence. The Constitutional Court assessed that the dismissal process served to mitigate threats to national security and was proportionate within the framework of Article 15 of the Constitution and the Statutory Decrees enacted under the State of Emergency. The Court concluded that, based on evidence and digital analysis reports confirming links to the organization, there was no violation of the right to respect for private life, and the claim regarding the presumption of innocence was declared inadmissible due to lack of merit.

⚠ Document too long (70 pages); summary generated from first and last pages.

Constitutional Court Rules Violation in Public Official Dismissal Case

The Constitutional Court ruled that the dismissal of a public official under Decree-Law No. 692 due to alleged links with FETÖ/PDY violated the right to respect for private life. The Court held that the digital forensic reports and classification codes used as evidence were insufficient to justify dismissal without adequate judicial scrutiny. Consequently, the Court ordered a retrial, while rejecting claims concerning the presumption of innocence and the right to a trial within a reasonable time.

⚠ Document too long (72 pages); summary generated from first and last pages.

Constitutional Court Rules on Violation of Effective Remedy Right Due to Passport Ban

The Constitutional Court ruled that the applicant's right to an effective remedy, in conjunction with the right to respect for private life and the right to education, was violated due to the unlawful imposition of a travel ban on their passport and the subsequent failure of administrative and judicial processes to provide adequate redress. The Court ordered the case to be remitted to the Administrative Court for retrial to remedy the consequences of the violation, while rejecting the claim for compensation.

Constitutional Court Ruling on the Right to Liberty and Security

The applicant, Fatih Ayan, filed an individual application to the Constitutional Court claiming that the compensation awarded for his period of unlawful detention and judicial control was insufficient following his acquittal. The Court evaluated that, alongside the compensation amount, the deduction of the applicant's detention period from his potential prison sentence served as a compensatory measure for the loss of liberty. Concluding that the set-off process provided adequate reparation within the principles of compensation law, the Constitutional Court ruled that there was no violation of the right to liberty and security of person.